BREAKING: Federal Judge and Wife Lose Composure as Karoline Leavitt Unleashes Unseen Evidence — Major Allegation Confirmed
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt caused a political firestorm after sharply criticizing Federal Judge James Boasberg, labeling him a partisan “activist” for blocking President Trump’s deportation directive. What escalated the controversy further was her decision to bring the judge’s wife, Elizabeth Manson, into the spotlight, citing her history of donating over $10,000 to Democratic candidates.
Clashing Over Migrant Flights
Leavitt’s fiery remarks followed President Trump’s own tirade, in which he denounced Boasberg as a “radical left lunatic” after the judge temporarily halted the administration’s migrant deportation flights to El Salvador.
“This judge is attempting to claim that the President lacks the executive authority to deport foreign threats from our soil. That’s an outrageous misuse of the judiciary,” Leavitt stated at a heated press briefing.
She continued:
“Judge Boasberg has no such authority. This administration firmly believes the president has the right to act under the Alien Enemies Act. His ruling is not just legally flawed — it’s politically motivated.”
Leavitt further emphasized Boasberg’s Democratic ties, reminding the press that he was appointed by former President Barack Obama — although a reporter pointed out that he was initially put on the bench by George W. Bush.
Boasberg’s Background and Reaction
Judge Boasberg, a Yale Law graduate and Oxford alum, is known for serving on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which handles sensitive national security matters. He recently presided over a tense hearing with DOJ attorneys, demanding clarity on whether the government knowingly violated his deportation block.
Leavitt used the opportunity to claim that a disproportionate number of court injunctions in this century have been issued against Donald Trump — over 60%, she claimed, compared to other presidents — pointing to a broader judicial bias.
Musk and the GOP Join the Fight
Prominent Trump ally Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) echoed calls for impeachment, stating:
“I voted for Trump, not activist judges! It’s time to hold those obstructing the people’s agenda accountable.”
Her message received an enthusiastic nod from Elon Musk, who responded with a “💯” emoji on X, signaling full support.
Meanwhile, Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX) announced he would be introducing Articles of Impeachment against Judge Boasberg.
Chief Justice Pushes Back
Chief Justice John Roberts issued an uncharacteristically blunt rebuke to rising threats of judicial impeachment, stating:
“Impeachment is not a remedy for disagreement with a court ruling. The proper channel is the appeals process.”
Though Roberts didn’t directly mention Trump, his timing made the target clear. Trump had earlier posted on Truth Social, railing against Boasberg’s authority and doubling down on his claim that deporting alleged gang members was fulfilling the will of American voters.
Trump Responds to Roberts
When asked about Roberts’ statement in an interview with Laura Ingraham, Trump shrugged it off:
“He didn’t mention me by name. But a lot of people want this judge impeached. He’s just another radical leftist.”
Accusations of Judicial Overreach
Back at the White House, Deputy Chief of Staff Steven Miller weighed in:
“It’s outrageous to think one federal judge can command aircraft operations as though they’re the Commander-in-Chief. That’s not judicial oversight — that’s an overreach of epic proportions.”
Meanwhile, the Justice Department pushed back in a new legal filing, accusing Boasberg of “micromanaging national security operations,” and calling his scrutiny of flight timelines “logistically and operationally naive.”
A Growing Movement for Judicial Accountability
Trump’s allies in Congress are now echoing Musk’s call for judicial impeachments. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN) cited precedent from Jefferson and Madison in defense of ongoing impeachment efforts, despite warnings from the American Bar Association (ABA), which condemned attempts to politicize or intimidate the judiciary.
The ABA declared:
“We will not stay silent as the independence of the judiciary and legal profession is eroded.”
Final Thoughts
With Elon Musk amplifying calls to remove judges for rulings he disagrees with, and House Republicans taking action, the tension between Trump’s executive authority and the judiciary is reaching new heights. Legal experts warn that these clashes may pose a serious constitutional crisis.
While Judge Boasberg’s ruling temporarily blocked the deportation of over 200 suspected gang members — including alleged affiliates of Tren de Aragua and MS-13 — the White House insists the operation was a critical national security action.
In response to transparency concerns, the administration has refused to identify the deported individuals, citing operational security. Yet the White House confirmed it paid $6 million to El Salvador to process their return.
Amid this turmoil, the separation of powers — and the very role of courts in checking presidential authority — is now under scrutiny like never before.